IntroCompLast updated: August 22, 2015
|Where to Find the Introductions|
|Voting and Judging Rules|
|The Rest of the Rules|
|2015 IntroComp Winners:|
|1st Place||Beyond Division, by Joseph Geipel||2nd Place||Walker's Rift, by Hope Chow|
|3rd Place||Meld, by David Whyld|
|Honorable Mentions:(In random order)|
|*||Deprivation by Michael Coorlim|
|*||Voltage Cafe: Writing a dissertation is no dessert by anjchang|
|*||Lair of the Gorgonanth, Part 1: "Bring Me the Beard of Nimrod Supertramp" by Andrew Watt|
2015's introductions can be downloaded (either separately or as a single zipped file):
The requirements of IntroComp are deceptively simple: All entrants must submit the beginning of a new, never before seen work of interactive fiction that is not yet complete and for which the ending is somewhat uncertain. The introduction can be as short or as long as the author likes, so long as it is 1) a working, playable game and 2) interactive fiction. Only introductions to games which are slated for non-commercial release may be entered in the competition.
|Intent to Enter Deadline:||June 30, 2015|
|Introduction Submission Deadline:||July 31, 2015|
|Voting Deadline:||August 21, 2015|
There are three new things of note for the thirteenth annual IntroComp:
1st Place: $200
2nd Place: $150
3rd Place: $100
All values in US funds, minus any currency conversion fee that might be required. Void where prohibited by law. Some assembly required. No other warranty expressed or implied. Although the bag does not appear to inflate, rest assured oxygen will be flowing to the mask.
Oh, and in order to win you not only have to enter, but also finish your game (and tell Jacqueline you finished it). You will have one year (until August 22, 2016) to do so. No completed game? No money - and somewhere in the world, a fairy dies.
An explanation of the 'Honorable' category: anyone who enters but doesn't place in the top three will fit into this category. We want everyone to have an incentive to finish their game, so the first Honorable to complete their game will receive the $50 Honorable prize, provided that the entry isn't incredibly buggy and just sort of slapped together. (Since the money will be coming out of my pocket, I have the final word on that bit. No questions asked, and no complaining. Submit your solid, finished game in the spirit of the comp and you'll get the cash; submit something you obviously wrote for a SpeedIF and I shall mock you and keep the $50 for the next person who finishes their game.)
ALL official competition correspondence will be done by email (though quick questions may be asked on twitter). I do not frequent any of the various interactive fiction forums, so please don't post questions there and then complain when I don't reply. :)So, to reiterate (in very large font):
* for relatively small values of "frequently"
SO HOW LONG/SHORT SHOULD AN INTROCOMP ENTRY BE?
There are no strict length requirements. If you want to enter a complete game, or merely an opening screen or just a title, there's nothing technically stopping you - though given the voting rules, this may not be the best strategy.
I JUST HEARD ABOUT INTROCOMP, AND I ALREADY HAVE A WORK IN PROGRESS. IT'S EVEN HAD SOME LIGHT BETA TESTING... CAN I STILL SUBMIT AN INTENT TO ENTER?
Sure! Some people actually do plan for IntroComp in advance, and start their work ahead of time. Simply because you're just now hearing about it doesn't mean you couldn't enter the project you've been working on as long as it fits the other rules. And the more beta testing, the better! As long as it hasn't been released to the general public, you should be good to go.
WHAT LANGUAGE CAN I USE? ON WHICH PLATFORMS CAN ENTRIES BE RELEASED? CAN I RELEASE A GAME THAT ONLY RUNS ONLINE?
So long as your work is interactive fiction, there are no restrictions. Interactive fiction, in this case, is broadly defined as things that are (1) interactive and (2) either fiction or non-fiction, and include any and all languages and platforms, parser-based, choice-based, whatever. Inclusion of graphics and multimedia is fine, unless such inclusion is so excessive that a reasonable player would look at the work and call it a graphic adventure.
WHEN THE TIME COMES FOR ME TO FINISH MY WORK, COULD I INSTEAD CHOOSE TO JUST RELEASE A SEQUEL INSTEAD?
As long as the sequel picks up where the introduction left off, continues the same story, and comes to some sort of solid narrative conclusion, sure.
WHAT'S TO STOP ME FROM JUST ADDING "AND THEN THEY ALL DIED -- THE END" TO MY ENTRY AND THEN CLAIMING MY PRIZE? BWAHAHAHA!
Nothing... except the ridicule and ostracization of your peers. Also, keep in mind that you have to send me your address in order to get your prize. , and you'd be surprised how easy it is to acquire smelly, rotten salmon here in Alaska. Oops, wait, strike that — I moved from Alaska to Washington since taking over this comp, but I still have a pretty solid supply of salmon. Oops, wait, strike that, too — by summer of 2016 I will be living in Hawai'i, but I will literally be surrounded by fish, so this portion of the FAQ will still not have changed considerably.
CAN I SUBMIT A SECTION FROM THE MIDDLE OF MY GAME INSTEAD OF THE BEGINNING?
No, that would be ExcerptComp.
HOW ABOUT THE ENDING OF MY GAME?
Next question, please.
WHEN I FINISH WRITING MY GAME, CAN I SUBMIT IT TO IFCOMP?
No go, my friend. It would run afoul of the spirit of IFComp's "no prior release" rule. You may be allowed to enter it in other minicomps, though - ask your local minicomp dealer.
CAN I SUBMIT MORE THAN ONE ENTRY?
You may enter more than one entry, but only your top-voted entry will be ranked and eligible for a prize. So, have more than one game you're working on right now and you're not sure which one to focus on? Find out which premise will be the best received by the community by entering them here.
Of course, unless you wish to incite the wrath of the IF community and, more importantly, the competition organizer, any and all entries you enter should be well-tested and created in earnest. Please don't spam the competition with lots of half-baked entries. Need I reiterate that, as someone living near the waterfront in Seattle, it is really easy for me to acquire a high volume of fresh salmon at Pike's Place Market and mail it to you (and it won't be fresh by the time it arrives, trust me on this). Please, don't tempt me.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY 'A NEVER BEFORE SEEN WORK OF IF THAT IS NOT YET COMPLETE AND FOR WHICH THE ENDING IS SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN?
Pretty much what it says on the label. If your game is already complete, please don't chop the front end of it off, submit it to see if you win, then tack on the back half and release it. I would hope that you intend to finish the game, but that it not yet be close to being finished when you submit the introduction to IntroComp. IntroComp is for seeing whether or not a game idea is well-received before you invest the energy in writing the whole thing, and that the feedback you get from voters in the competition will help guide you as you work toward completing it.
WHAT ABOUT "SEASONED" AUTHORS? CAN THEY ENTER? DO THEY HAVE TO DO SOMETHING EXPERIMENTAL OR VERY NEW (TO THEM) TO ENTER?
IntroComp is about floating an idea. It can be experimental, but it need not necessarily be experimental. Anybody can enter, authors new or veteran. So, if Graham Nelson would like to enter, he may do so. He should submit a work of IF that is the kernel of an idea, an introduction to a game for which he has not yet fully conceived the ending. But it need not be a major departure in scope or language or approach for him.
(SIDE NOTE TO GRAHAM: This said, if you'd like to submit a simulationist introduction to a choice-based time management game written in TADS 3 about how a crazy cat lady deals with her her three dozen fluff bundles and give us a glimpse into the floor layout of your flat, I would welcome your intent to enter.)
WHY CAN'T I SUBMIT AN INTRODUCTION TO A GAME SLATED FOR COMMERCIAL RELEASE?
Because the prize money comes out of my bank account, and I'd prefer to give my money to non-commercial ventures. I never vote in IntroComp, but I am the one who donates the money for the winners (who are chosen by the people who vote) who go on to complete their intro. This isn't Kickstarter, and I don't feel like kickstarting commercial endeavors that I personally haven't weighed in on.
However, I would love it if someone entered an intro they weren't sure about, then it did well, they said to themselves, "Well, okay, I guess I'll write this thing then," and then as things went on they realized that they had the a great game on their hands and decided to distribute it commercially. That *is* in the spirit of IntroComp. If that happens organically, that's fine, but I would ask that the author consider (this part isn't enforceable, but I ask that the author at least consider) donating their prize money back to IntroComp if they end up making at least that amount in game sales.
YOU KEEP GOING ON ABOUT HOW YOU FOOT THE BILL ON PRIZES; CAN I MAKE A DONATION?
You know, I appreciate that, but the prize payouts are somewhat sporadic and I really don't like keeping track of who donated what. At least for now, I'm good with being the sole source, but thanks for your offer! If you have a non-monetary item you'd like to donate, that would be welcome, but I'll ask that you hold onto it until the time comes to award the prize, because I'd prefer to not have to keep track of such items, and there's really no point in things going through the mail more than once. Drop me a note if you have something cool you'd like to see go out to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or as an Honorable.
WHY DO YOU ONLY REVEAL THE RANKING OF THE TOP THREE GAMES?
WHERE ARE THE SHINY HISTOGRAMS? I'LL WANT TO KNOW HOW WELL I REALLY DID! While not a competition reserved for new authors, it's meant to be a competition that's kinder and less brutal to that crowd in particular. The real prize is feedback. Hence the concealment of who comes in last, or how poorly the entries near the bottom of the pack did. It's also the reason why, as of 2012, we began requesting that people leave a line or two of feedback when they vote for each entry.
WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I THINK ONE OR MORE OF THESE RULES IS REALLY ASININE?!
First off, you should know that that is fine. It's your right to think that, and you have some options. You can start your own competition with the perfect set of rules (or no rules at all!). But that's quite a bit of work. You could start a flamewar thread about how IntroComp sucks and shouldn't be a competition at all. But hmm... that's already been done and would be so very 2005 of you. My best suggestion is to write a professional-tone email to email@example.com which points out your concern(s), explains why that/those issue(s) is/are of concern, and propose one or two alternatives for the organizer to consider. Send that e-mail expecting a reply, possibly a bit of back and forth discussion, and make peace with the possibility that the rule might change, or it might change but not until next year's comp, or it might not change at all.
WAS THAT LAST ANSWER REALLY NECESSARY?
Sorry, no. That was probably passive-aggressive of me. Sorry about that.
BUT I STILL WANT TO KNOW MORE!
That wasn't exactly a question, that was more of an exclamation... but I get your point. Maybe you should take a look at the ifWiki to learn more on previous years' IntroComps.
If you still have a question after that, drop an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org